San Francisco Ballet -- Performance 3 -- Firebird -- Review
Program 3 -- Firebird
-- San Francisco Ballet Performance
February
28, 2014
Three ballets make up Program 3: The
Kingdom of the Shades, which comes from Act II of a ballet called La Bayadére, by Ludwig Minkus and Natalia
Makarova; Ghosts, by Kip Winger and
Christopher Wheeldon; and Firebird,
by Igor Stravinsky and Yuri Possokhov. They
all have to do with male idealizations and conflicts about women. They are psychological in that they deal with
the internal, psychic representations of women in the male imagination rather
than with stories, events, or women who might be real. Firebird
is by far and away the superior of the three.
The Kingdom of the
Shades is a sublime display of dance technique at the highest level and
great visual beauty. According to the
program notes, "The scene is the opium-induced hallucination of Solor, who
grieves for his love, the murdered temple dancere (bayadére)
Nikiya." However, you would never
guess this upon watching the ballet.
There is no suggestion of opium influencing Solor (Denis Matvienko), who
presents several impressive solos that show him perfectly sharp and at the top
of his game. There is also no suggestion
that Nikiya (Maria Kochetkova) has been murdered, or that she is even
dead. What you get is the sense that
Solor is dealing with an illusion about a woman, not any woman in particular,
but an abstraction of woman, a phantasm.
Nikiya is not a woman who actually exists or ever did exist except in
Solor's imagination. It is a naive,
idealized conception of a woman by someone who doesn't really know women very
well. The music starts out somber,
nostalgic and conflicted, but morphs into a series of waltzes that grow
progressively cheesier as they go along.
What saves the ballet is the technical brilliance of the dancers, which
we have become spoiled into taking for granted at the San Francisco Ballet, and
the visual beauty of the staging and choreography. Once again the San Francisco Ballet has taken
something that is short on substance and turned it into a pleasing visual
spectacle.
Ghosts is a
more interesting performance in my eyes and ears. The music is more interesting and the
choreography and staging have a greater sense of freedom and imagination. The ballet is abstract. The theme is Ghosts. Well, what is
that? What you see are pairs of
male-female couples, that stay pretty much in those pairs throughout the
performance. There are a couple of
triangles with two men and a woman, but there is a strong sense of the
male-female couple throughout this ballet.
And the couples are strongly interactive. They look at each other and touch each other
and are quite involved with one another physically and emotionally all the way
through.
My understanding of a ghost is that it has to do with the
past and with the imagination. A ghost
haunts one by intruding into ones consciousness unbidden and unsolicited. An experience or person of some significance,
but long past, continues to disrupt and influence ones present emotional
balance and cannot be easily dismissed. One
does not get that sense from this ballet.
There is no sense of the past that I could discern. And these ghosts were benign, whereas I think
a ghost suggests something ominous. A
ghost is an unwelcome presence in my
understanding. This ballet has no such
overtones. One does not get a strong emotional fix on
this ballet, but it is visually interesting and danced with a high degree of
skill.
The highlight of the evening was Firebird, with music by Igor Stravinsky and choreography by Yuri
Possokhov. This ballet has an
interesting concept and is beautifully staged and danced to high quality
music. The dance and the music
complement one another very effectively, which is something I especially like
to see in a dance performance. This is
one I would like to see again, because I don't feel like I got it all on the
first viewing. It is a complex,
ambiguous story that allows for a wide range of interpretation. I might have to study this one some before I
come to a clearer conception.
The Firebird is a mythical figure (female) who seems to fall
in love with a prince. They part on good
terms for reasons that are not clear and the prince then takes up with a princess. The relationship between the Firebird and the
Princess is not clear, and I am wondering if they are the same in some
sense? A devil-like character, Kaschei,
appears and brings discord to the romantic couple. The nature of the discord is not clear, but
the Firebird reappears to dispel Kaschei and restore the couple's harmony and equilibrium. The story ends with an apparent wedding and a
happily ever after sequel. According to
the program notes it is supposed to represent the ultimate triumph of good over
evil, something I am finding it increasingly hard to believe in the older I
get, but the story is very positive and uplifting and danced and staged at a
superb level of skill and taste.
What I can say now is that this story, like the previous two
ballets, has to do with male psychology, with male conflicts and idealizations
of women, and it represents them in much more depth and interest than the
previous two ballets. The Firebird seems
to represent the sensual, sexualized woman of the male imagination. It is she who rescues the beleaguered young
couple beset by turmoil sown by Kaschei, the disruptive, dissatisfied, restless
aspect of the young male. It is the
Princess's ability to tap the sexual energy of the Firebird, the hidden
Firebird within herself, that enables her tame Kaschei, to hold the male's
interest, and create a lasting, stable bond.
It is not exactly a triumph of good over evil, but rather a triumph of
human connection through sexual bonding over disappointment and
dissolution. This is one you should go
see, if you have a chance. It is both
mentally challenging and aesthetically satisfying.